Re: John 16:15: EMA ESTIN -- why accusative?

Jonathan Robie (74144.2360@compuserve.com)
21 Aug 96 17:33:24 EDT

Conrad, Don, Carlton, Paul,

Thanks for the corrections, it makes a lot more sense now that
I'm reading it correctly! Incidentally, Perschbacher's Analytical
Lexicon lists John 10:14 as an example of the two uses of EMA:

EGW EIMI hO POIMHN hO KALOS,
KAI GINWSKW TA EMA (acc. plural of EMOS)
KAI GINWSKOUSI ME TA EMA (nom. plural of EMOS)

I'll tape that to my synapses so I'll remember it next time.

Jonathan