Re: Why isn't BAPTIZW translated?

DWILKINS@ucrac1.ucr.edu
Thu, 19 Sep 1996 11:43:32 -0700 (PDT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Randy Leedy: "Morph search in Logos 2.0"
Previous message: JSmelser@aol.com: "Re: Why isn't BAPTIZW translated?"

I think BAPTIZW does to a large extent retain its essential meaning, technical
term or not, but that includes the possibility of virtually any medium
being the medium of baptism. That in turn allows a metaphorical interpretation
so that we needn't assume a liquid is implied.

Don Wilkins
UC Riverside

Next message: Randy Leedy: "Morph search in Logos 2.0"
Previous message: JSmelser@aol.com: "Re: Why isn't BAPTIZW translated?"