Heb 11:16b revisited....

Tom Launder (ae298@lafn.org)
Fri, 03 Jan 1997 23:54:32 -0800

Hi and thanks to all who have helped,

I just want to make sure that I understand correctly what I have been
told.

DIO OUK EPAISXUNETAI AUTOUS O QEOS QEOS EPIKALEISQAI AUTWN

dio

Qeos | epaisxunetai | autous
o ouk |
| // epikaleisQai | Qeos
| | / autwn
|-----|--

I have understood epikaleisQai to be a complimentary inf and Qeos to a
predicate nominative. I believe that Prof. Winbrey understands the
infinitive as result rather than complimentary.

So did I understand this correctly?

Thanks

Tom