Re: I Cor. 12:31 MEIZONA

Mike Adams (adtech@sprynet.com)
Mon, 6 Jan 1997 09:59:03 -0700

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Luke McNab: "Re: Etymology vs. Usage"
Previous message: Petur Knutsson: "eudokia(s)"
Maybe in reply to: Mike Adams: "I Cor. 12:31 MEIZONA"

>
>
> The verb ZHLOUTE can be grammatically
> parsed to either be a
> a. present - active - imperative
> or
> b. present - active - indicative
>
> If a, then it is a command.
>
> If b, then it is just a statement of fact.
>
> If b, then it is just a statement of fact
> which is more of an ironic rebuke from Paul by saying
> that the Corinthian persons were too
> pre-occupied with seeking spectacular
> spiritual gifts for themselves.

Whipping out my handy Friberg, I see: VIPA or VMPA. hmm. Didn't even think
of looking at ZHLOUTE, but it seems to create a smoother transition to the
second part of the verse and to the next chapter.

hmm. Definitely something to think about. Thanks!!!

Ellen Adams
wife of Mike
co-Pastor WellSpring Fellowship
Sheridan, Colorado
(listed in order of importance)

Next message: Luke McNab: "Re: Etymology vs. Usage"
Previous message: Petur Knutsson: "eudokia(s)"
Maybe in reply to: Mike Adams: "I Cor. 12:31 MEIZONA"