Re: EGW EIMI

S. M. Baugh (smbaugh@adnc.com)
Tue, 11 Mar 1997 21:20:20 -0800

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Micheal Palmer: "Re: TLG question"
Previous message: S. M. Baugh: "RE: EGW EIMI"

Ronald Wong wrote:
>I certain agree that the construction is strange...yet, I believe that
>there is a historical purpose that Jesus and the way John recorded it to
>mean "I, I am." There is an OT pararallel. . . [some omitted] . . .
> think it would be possible to say that John and Jesus are
>emphasizing
>(if I can be allowed to use the word :) ) Jesus' claim of being God, . . .

I caught that! Thought you could get away with it didn't you!

<g>

S. M. Baugh
Westminster Theological Seminary
in California

Next message: Micheal Palmer: "Re: TLG question"
Previous message: S. M. Baugh: "RE: EGW EIMI"