thank you Micheal

Brian E. Wilson (brian@twonh.demon.co.uk)
Sat, 5 Apr 1997 08:01:07 +0100

>At 8:46 PM +0000 2/19/97, Brian E. Wilson wrote:
>What is wrong with regarding the Scripture as the supremely-
>authoritative, God-breathed imperfect confirmation of the good news of
>Christ? In my view, this is consistent with the above and with every
>part of the Scripture, including the way in which Jesus himself regarded
>Scripture as supremely-authorative, God-breathed and imperfect.

It is refreshing to see this view expressed on B-Greek.

Micheal Palmer

>Paul Watkins (from another list) wrote:
>Brian, you have been removed from the Greek list. I'm afraid we can't
>tolerate non-inerrantism, as that is the plank upon which our entire
>faith rests. You say it rests on the gospel, and I say the gospel
>message would not have come to us if it weren't for that inerrant
>Bible. If it is errant, the gospel cannot be trusted and there is
>nothing we can trust in. We do not seek approbation by men of the
>things of God. Let God be true and every man a liar!

>Please understand that while you consider yourself evangelical, few
>true evangelicals would. Belief in the inerrancy and infallibility of
>Scripture is central to the faith. Denial of that is no less than
>heresy, and I would admonish you to seek the Lord's favor with tears
>that He might reform your heart and overcome the wisdom of man which
>presently defines your religion.
>Paul Watkins

Thank you, Micheal!

-- 
Brian E. Wilson