[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: wondering....
- To: Lance Crimm <Lance_Crimm@daystar.com>
- Subject: Re: wondering....
- From: Troy de Jongh <troyd@arh.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jun 1997 15:10:03 -0500 (CDT)
- Cc: b-greek@virginia.edu
- In-Reply-To: <199706171946.PAA10531@atl.eni.net> from "Lance Crimm" at Jun 17, 97 03:38:21 pm
- Reply-To: troyd@arh.com
Lance Crimm writes:
>
> I was wondering what the general consensus is out there on the
> difficulty of different geneologies of Jesus.
> Is Matthew's Joseph's and Luke's Marys?
> Or is it the fairly recent thing I heard that perhaps Joseph was
> adopted and he goes back to DAvid both ways?
> Or is it something else? I would tend to think it is important
> for us to figure out since the Bible has it in there.
> Thanks, Lance
Take a look at the essay located at
http://www.ihi.aber.ac.uk/~spk/infancy3.html
It gives attention to the many different geneology theories out there.
--
Troy de Jongh troyd@euler.com
References: