Col 1:19

Peter Phillips (p.m.phillips@cliff.shef.ac.uk)
Tue, 5 Aug 1997 14:46:09 +0100

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Carl W. Conrad: "Re: Col 1:19"
Previous message: Edward Pothier, Physics Dept.: "Re: CIPHER NUMBERS IN GREEK MANUSCRIPTS"
Next in thread: Will Wagers: "Re: Col 1:19"

Do you think PAN TO PLHRWMA is the subject of verse 19 or part of an
accusative+infinitive construction after EUDOKHSEN with HO QEOS supplied as
the subject of this verb?

If it is the subject what does it mean in a pre/proto-Gnostic setting?

If HO QEOS is to be supplied then why didn't [Paul] use the passive as he
has throughout the previous verses?

Pete Phillips,
Cliff College, Sheffield, England

p.m.phillips@cliff.shef.ac.uk
http://champness.shef.ac.uk/

Next message: Carl W. Conrad: "Re: Col 1:19"
Previous message: Edward Pothier, Physics Dept.: "Re: CIPHER NUMBERS IN GREEK MANUSCRIPTS"
Next in thread: Will Wagers: "Re: Col 1:19"