Re: hHKW/hHKASIN in Mk 8:3--pf or pres?

Jim West (jwest@highland.net)
Wed, 15 Oct 1997 09:20:10 -0400 (EDT)

At 08:46 AM 10/15/97 -0400, you wrote:
>This is prob. a traditional crux, but should hHKASIN in Mk 8:3 be parsed as
>a perfect form or a present form? I find it listed as a pf in BDF s.101 and
>(I assume*) BAGD, 344. But Gramcord/Accordance parses it as a present, as
>does Mounce (both in his Analytical and in his Morphology) and
>Brooks/Winbery (Morphology, 136 n. 1--which also lists *BAGD as supporting
>pres.!?).
>
>Rod

unlike all those you site, I take it as a "kappa" aorist.

jim

>
>_________________________________________________________________
> Rodney J. Decker Baptist Bible Seminary
> Asst. Prof./NT P O Box 800
> rdecker@bbc.edu Clarks Summit PA 18411
> http://www.bbc.edu/courses/BBS/RDecker/Index.htm USA
>_________________________________________________________________
>
>
>
+++++++++++++++++++++++
Jim West

Adjunct Professor of Bible,
Quartz Hill School of Theology

jwest@highland.net