Re: Case Systems and Chaos

clayton bartholomew (c.s.bartholomew@worldnet.att.net)
Wed, 05 Nov 1997 22:33:43 +0000

Stephen C. Carlson wrote:
>
> No, the Second Law does not apply to languages nor even to
> the planet earth, for they are open systems. Entropy may
> decrease in open systems, although in closed systems it
> increases.
>
> It has been evident that, from an information science
> perspective, losses in distinctions according to one
> mechanism, e.g. case endings, have led to the
> preservation of the same kinds of distinctions via a
> different mechanism, e.g. mandatory prepositions. Another
> example, is the French verb system. Phonological changes
> resulted in most of the verb forms having identical
> pronunciations, forcing the mandatory use of subject
> pronouns.
>

Stephen

This is a fascinating response. I was under the impression that
languages deteriorated over time. Where did I get this idea?
Is there not a observable pattern outside of natural sciences
that shows a tendency for things to *fall apart.* Language is a
social phenomena, other social phenomena have a tendency to
move from organization to disorganization. A few examples of
this are Civilizations, Nations, Clubs, Churches, Families,
Tribes, Businesses. All of these move from ordered states to
disordered states with a fairly predictable pattern.

Now you will probably argue that Languages are not like
Civilizations or Families, that this is an unseemly comparison.
Perhaps you are correct in making this objection (if you make
it). But I think there is more to be said about the tendency
towards disorder than what the second law of thermodynamics
states. After all the Chaos dragon had been around several
millennia before thermodynamics came along.

Clay Bartholomew
Three Tree Point