Re: von Soden to verify Ropes

Glen Riddle (glen1@flash.net)
Wed, 26 Nov 1997 17:47:22 -0700

This is a bit old, but I was intrigued when this came up and just now got
time to dig around in the von Soden text: oun|deIa1[delta 5 superscript](gg
d) g. Sorry the font didn't transfer correctly; if you want the specific,
I'll be glad to copy and send regular mail.
glen riddle
871 kenya rd., se
rio rancho, nm 87124

clayton bartholomew wrote:

> Ropes reads OUN for DE in Bezae for Acts 7:12. This is minutia but I
> cannot find this reading in any other source available to me. Alford
> tracks with Ropes about 99% even on spelling issues like EI for H, etc.
> So I am wondering if Ropes slipped up here or if this reading has fallen
> through the cracks in my other sources.
>
> Could some one who has von Sonden check this reading and let me know?
>
> Clay Bartholomew
> Three Tree Point
>
> Postscript
>
> Is von Soden available anywhere for purchase? If not is there some other
> reference that would serve as a substitute? I understand (from K. & B.
> Aland's book) that von Soden is somewhat difficult to use. Can anyone
> verify this? What is one to do if one wants to study the text of the NT
> in detail?