[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Isa. 7:14
-
To: b-greek: ;
-
Subject: Isa. 7:14
-
From: rod.j.decker@uwrf.edu
-
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 1994 22:20:01 -0500 (CDT)
Re. Isa. 7:14, I don't have the time to pursue the linguistic
ramifications just now, but I will suggest one hermeneutical
factor that ought to be considered. If Matthew's citation is
viewed as asserting the fulfillment of a _prophecy_, then there
are some difficult questions to answer. That is not, however, the
only option. I think that it would be extremely difficult to
justify an exegesis of Isa. 7 that attributes to Isaiah explicit
reference to Messiah's birth. The context of chapters 7 & 8
demands, I think, an immediate, historical ref. to the birth of
Maher-Shalal-Hash-Baz as a sign to Ahaz. In such an instance almah
need not refer to a virgin in the technical sense. [The only
alternatives to this (other than suggesting an error somewhere)
are to postulate some sort of double-meaning or sensus plenior
(IMHO, problematic as often defined).]
I would suggest that we should view Matthew's reference
typologically. I.e., he identifies the Immanuel prophecy and its
fulfillment as an appropriate type of Jesus' birth (types, as well
as direct prophecy, can be fulfilled). This obviates Isaiah's
understanding the technicalities of the virgin birth and the
resulting discrepency (in word meaning &/or translation choice)
between the immediate and prophetic contexts. In the context of
Matthew's citation, as has been pointed out already, there is no
question that he intended Jesus' conception to be understood as
virginal.
Hopefully Dave Turner will have time to comment on this issue
since he is in the midst of writing an exegetical commentary on
Matthew (hopefully nearing completion, Dave?).
Rod
Rodney J. Decker
Assistant Professor of Greek and Theology
Calvary Theological Seminary, Kansas City
(94-95 sabbatical explains the Univ. of Wisc. address!)