Re: Q and Papias

• To: Carl W Conrad <cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu>
• Subject: Re: Q and Papias
• From: David Coomler <davidco@nethost.multnomah.lib.or.us>
• Date: Sat, 29 Oct 1994 08:20:10 -0700 (PDT)
• Cc: STEVE SCHAPER <STEVE.SCHAPER@1-100-435-0.cheswicks.toadnet.org>, b-greek@virginia.edu
• In-Reply-To: <Pine.NXT.3.91.941029063530.14810E-100000@peach>

On Sat, 29 Oct 1994, Carl W Conrad wrote:

> On 27 Oct 1994, STEVE SCHAPER wrote:
> >  
> >  Identical? No. Curiously different in wording, while being very similar. The
> > closest analogy I've seen are separate eyewitnesses writing down what they've
> > remembered of a speech or major event.
> 
In many cases the differences in wording can be explained simply as
"Matthew's" improving (in his eyes) or changing a term in Mark that was
found inappropriate or inelegant.

David

• Re: Q and Papias
• From: Larry Swain <lswain@billings.lib.mt.us>

• Re: Q and Papias
• From: Carl W Conrad <cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu>

• Prev: MCI error messages
• Next: Re: Q and Papias
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread