Re: John 1:1, Structure and Transl.

• To: Dvdmoore@aol.com
• Subject: Re: John 1:1, Structure and Transl.
• From: stcdc <stcdc@cais.cais.com>
• Date: Wed, 23 Nov 1994 15:54:54 -0500 (EST)
• Cc: jordan@chuma.cas.usf.edu, b-greek@virginia.edu
• In-Reply-To: <941123144003_5843481@aol.com>

On Wed, 23 Nov 1994 Dvdmoore@aol.com wrote:

> 
>      Besides the foregoing, LOGOS should probably not be understood as "word"
> in the strictest sense of that term here.  Recent discussion on this list has
> shown that LOGOS is very ample semantically, and many of its other meanings
> probably come closer to what John was expressing than "word" understood
> strictly. 

Doesn't John's entire prologue make it pretty clear that the Word is Christ?
How many other meanings can there be in this context?

Chuck Arnold
Upper Marlboro, MD
 

• Re: John 1:1, Structure and Transl.
• From: Carl W Conrad <cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu>

• John 1:1, Structure and Transl.
• From: Dvdmoore@aol.com

• Prev: John 1:1, Structure and Transl.
• Next: Re: John 1:1, Structure and Transl.
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread