Re: Papyrologists and alledged earliest Gospel fragm.

From: Paul Moser (PMOSER@cpua.it.luc.edu)
Date: Mon Aug 14 1995 - 11:37:00 EDT


Scott,
Thiede's view has not found wide acceptance. For an overview of
the debate and a somewhat sympathetic treatment, see O. Betz &
R. Riesner, *Jesus, Qumran, and the Vatican* (Crossroad, 1994).
One obvious problem is that Thiede has to change some of the
fragment's letters to get apparent agreement with Mark's gospel.
--Paul Moser, Loyola University of Chicago.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:25 EDT