Re: So what becomes of Colwell's Rule?

From: Carl W. Conrad (cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu)
Date: Fri Aug 18 1995 - 16:51:16 EDT

Next message: Paul Dixon - Ladd Hill Bible Church: "Re: So what becomes of Colwell's Rule?"
Previous message: KevLAnder@aol.com: "So what becomes of Colwell's Rule?"
Maybe in reply to: KevLAnder@aol.com: "So what becomes of Colwell's Rule?"
Next in thread: Paul Dixon - Ladd Hill Bible Church: "Re: So what becomes of Colwell's Rule?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 2:11 PM 8/18/95, KevLAnder@aol.com wrote:
>It is truly unfortunate that so much misunderstanding and misuse of Colwell's
>Rule has been propogated for the cause of orthodoxy--and all this revolving
>around one verse of Scripture, J 1:1. Why, even in the recent Greek grammar
>authored by David Alan Black (Broadman, 1993, on p 182) Colwell's Rule is
>incorrectly articulated (pardon the pun, please).

Even if correctly articulated, I would hope that it won't become arthritic.
(Couldn't resist. I apologize)

Carl W. Conrad
Department of Classics, Washington University
One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO, USA 63130
(314) 935-4018
cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu OR cwc@oui.com
WWW: http://www.artsci.wustl.edu/~cwconrad/

Next message: Paul Dixon - Ladd Hill Bible Church: "Re: So what becomes of Colwell's Rule?"
Previous message: KevLAnder@aol.com: "So what becomes of Colwell's Rule?"
Maybe in reply to: KevLAnder@aol.com: "So what becomes of Colwell's Rule?"
Next in thread: Paul Dixon - Ladd Hill Bible Church: "Re: So what becomes of Colwell's Rule?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:25 EDT