From: Bruce Terry (terry@bible.acu.edu)
Date: Thu Sep 07 1995 - 17:09:25 EDT
On Thu, 7 Sep 1995, David Moore wrote:
>On Thu, 7 Sep 1995 WINBROW@aol.com wrote:
>
>> I think that the order of the two words are reversed in D.
>> Carlton Winbery
>>
>
> Yes, the Nestle apparatus on Lk. 2:2 indicates that the order of
>the two words is reversed in both Aleph and D. It is the parentheses
>around D in the apparatus on this particular phrase that interest me. On
>p. 54* of the introduction in the Nestle 27th edition, there is an
>explanation of parentheses that appear in the apparatus. As I understand
>this section of the Introduction, it is saying that the parentheses
>indicate a minor difference from the main variant. So I wonder how D
>differs (in a minor way) from Aleph, in this phrase.
According to von Soden, EGENETO is placed before APOGRAFH in D ("Iad5 ~ EG. a
APOG."), giving the order hAUTH EGENETO APOGRAFH PRWTH hHGEMONEUONTOS.
********************************************************************************
Bruce Terry E-MAIL: terry@bible.acu.edu
Box 8426, ACU Station Phone: 915/674-3759
Abilene, Texas 79699 Fax: 915/674-3769
********************************************************************************
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:26 EDT