Matt. 20:22

From: Eric Vaughan (jevaughan@sauaca.saumag.edu)
Date: Wed Oct 25 1995 - 11:57:52 EDT

• Next message: Carl W. Conrad: "Re: Matt. 20:22"
• Previous message: Rod Decker: "De, kai, & euQus in Mark; was: Grammatical Tense, LEGW,"
• Next in thread: Carl W. Conrad: "Re: Matt. 20:22"
• Maybe reply: Carl W. Conrad: "Re: Matt. 20:22"
• Maybe reply: Rod Decker: "Re: Matt. 20:22"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Why does the New American Standard Bible leave out
KAI TO BAPTISMA hO EGW BAPTIZOMAI BAPTISQHNAI; in
Matt 20:22? Is it the same reason they left out
hO WN EN TW OURANW in Jno. 3:13?

• Next message: Carl W. Conrad: "Re: Matt. 20:22"
• Previous message: Rod Decker: "De, kai, & euQus in Mark; was: Grammatical Tense, LEGW,"
• Next in thread: Carl W. Conrad: "Re: Matt. 20:22"
• Maybe reply: Carl W. Conrad: "Re: Matt. 20:22"
• Maybe reply: Rod Decker: "Re: Matt. 20:22"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:31 EDT