Re: What's Wrong with Q?

From: Carl W. Conrad (cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu)
Date: Fri Oct 13 1995 - 14:25:15 EDT


At 9:46 AM 10/13/95, Paul Moser wrote:
> The
>debate here must be settled by inference to the
>best explanation, rather than by strict proof,
>but still the assumptions of Markan priority
>and Q sources have unsurpassed explanatory power.

Thanks, Paul. This point of view, which may not be the majority opinion on
our list but is certainly the majority opinion among NT scholars, needs to
be re-asserted from time to time, especially in view of the most recent
wave of right-wing fundamentalist hogwash.

Cheers, cwc

Carl W. Conrad
Department of Classics, Washington University
One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO, USA 63130
(314) 935-4018
cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu OR cwc@oui.com
WWW: http://www.artsci.wustl.edu/~cwconrad/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:31 EDT