From: Carlton Winbery (winberyc@popalex1.linknet.net)
Date: Mon Dec 04 1995 - 17:25:04 EST
Ken Litwak wrote;
> Isn't it circular to argue that since Mark doesn't use nai, Mark didn't use
>nai?
Yes, if that were the argument. But the mention of the fact that NAI is
present more often in Matt. than in Mk. speaks only to style which is only
one consideration. The major consideration in Mark 7 is harmonization.
Carlton Winbery
Prof. Religion
LA College,
Pineville,La
winberyc@popalex1.linknet.net
fax (318) 442-4996
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:33 EDT