From: Kenneth Litwak (kenneth@sybase.com)
Date: Sun Dec 10 1995 - 20:49:45 EST
I would second Carl's plea for a return to appropriate topics. By
way of changing gears, I hope, and so as not to leave others with
the impression that I somehow think Porter is the enemy, Porter, in
discussinng the imperative, suggests that echete in Rom. 6:22 may well
be an imperative: have fruit, rather than an indicative: you have
fruit. This seems both reasonable and likely to me, but Porter said
virtually all commentators take it as indicative. What do others think?
Ken Litwak
GTU
Bezerkley, CA
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:34 EDT