From: James D. Ernest (ernest@mv.mv.com)
Date: Tue Dec 19 1995 - 08:05:28 EST
On Mon, 18 Dec 1995, Carlton Winbery wrote:
> In Acts 24:21 Paul said PERI MIAS TAUTHS FWNHS hHS _EKEKRAXA_ EN AUTOIS
> "concerning this cry which _I cried out_ among them . . ." My question is
> this. Could EKEKRAXA be from a verb spelled EGKRAZW instead of being an
> irregular form of the verb KRAZW as it is given in BAGD, Thayer, Louw &
> Nida, etc.? In the morphology (Brooks and Winbery, p. 425) we followed
> BAGD and listed two forms of the 3rd principal part of KRAZW. Could this
> not be a compound with the prep. EK added to the front of the verb without
> changing its essential meaning, only intensifying it? I do not have L&S
> here at home to check it, but does anyone know of any non-NT use of such a
> word outside the 3rd pp.?
>
LSJ has both EGKRAZW and EKKRAZW; I don't see how the form you
cite could be from the former, since the G wd by N before a vowel,
or the former, since there G wd be xi. Right?
-----------------------------------------------------------------
James D. Ernest Joint Doctoral Program
Manchester, New Hampshire, USA Andover-Newton/Boston College
Internet: ernest@mv.mv.com Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:34 EDT