Mpol 10

From: Carlton Winbery (winberyc@popalex1.linknet.net)
Date: Wed Jan 17 1996 - 03:37:36 EST

Next message: Carlton Winbery: "Re: Mpol 10"
Previous message: Kenneth Litwak: "MPol 10: Grammar questions"
Next in thread: Carlton Winbery: "Re: Mpol 10"
Maybe reply: Carlton Winbery: "Re: Mpol 10"
Maybe reply: Carl W. Conrad: "Re: Mpol 10"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

A further note on MPol 10:2
I wrote earlier;
>SU MEN KAN LOGOU HXIWSA should be rendered literally "I should have (KAN,
>contrary to fact) considered you worthy of a word." LOGOS here probably
>refers to a "discussion."<

I would add that KAN is crasis for KAI AN. AN with an aorist indicative
this indicates a contrary to fact statement. The fact is that he did not
formerly consider him worthy.

Carlton L. Winbery
Prof. Religion
LA College, Pineville, La
winberyc@popalex1.linknet.net

Next message: Carlton Winbery: "Re: Mpol 10"
Previous message: Kenneth Litwak: "MPol 10: Grammar questions"
Next in thread: Carlton Winbery: "Re: Mpol 10"
Maybe reply: Carlton Winbery: "Re: Mpol 10"
Maybe reply: Carl W. Conrad: "Re: Mpol 10"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:36 EDT