Re: logizetai eis sperma...

From: Edwfudge@aol.com
Date: Sun Mar 31 1996 - 17:21:53 EST

• Next message: David Moore: "Re: logizetai eis sperma..."
• Previous message: Carl W. Conrad: "Re: logizetai eis sperma..."
• Maybe in reply to: Edwfudge@aol.com: "logizetai eis sperma..."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

I'm a bit rusty on this (remembering from LXX reading
class during an M.A. course in 1967-68) but I believe
this construction might have come into NT from LXX
where it literalistically translated the Hebrew inseparable
B' with EIS in the case of predicate acc. or pred. nom.

Edward Fudge
Houston, Texas

• Next message: David Moore: "Re: logizetai eis sperma..."
• Previous message: Carl W. Conrad: "Re: logizetai eis sperma..."
• Maybe in reply to: Edwfudge@aol.com: "logizetai eis sperma..."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:40 EDT