From: J.D.F.=van=Halsema%BW_KG%TheoFilos@esau.th.vu.nl
Date: Wed Aug 28 1996 - 09:51:01 EDT
2 Cor. 10:2 reads:
deomai de to mh parwn qarrhsai etc
This sentence is usually constructed as follows:
deomai + to (acc) + mh + qarrhsai (inf),
with parwn in between.
See, e.g., RSV:
I beg of you that when I am present I may not have to show boldness
In my view, this sentence can be also read like this:
deomai de to - mh parwn - qarrhsai
Translation: But I want indeed when I am not present to show boldness etc
Or: But I want indeed in absence to show boldness etc
Which gives quite another argumentative structure (but quite good sence!).
With help of the gramcord system and some grammars I have searched for
arguments which make this reading impossible. I have not been able to find
one.
I do hope someone can refute me, before putting this reading in my PhD-thesis
Erik
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Erik van Halsema |Senior Research Assistant Vrije Universiteit
j.d.f.van_halsema@esau.th.vu.nl |Faculty of Theology
jdfvh@dds.nl |De Boelelaan 1105,
http://huizen.dds.nl/~jdfvh |1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:49 EDT