Re: Mark 1:11

From: Perry Robert Wiles (pwiles@extro.ucc.su.oz.au)
Date: Mon Sep 09 1996 - 08:06:28 EDT

• Next message: Mike Phillips: "Re: Mark 1:11"
• Previous message: Kevin W. Woodruff: "Re: Mark 1:11"
• In reply to: Mike Phillips: "Re: Mark 1:11"
• Next in thread: Mike Phillips: "Re: Mark 1:11"
• Reply: Mike Phillips: "Re: Mark 1:11"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Contra Zerwick Luke 7:35 seems a clear example of a gnomic aorist.
Usage in Mk 1:11 also seems to require a timeless sense, hence gnomic
seems correct designation.

Perry Wiles
Moore Theological College

• Next message: Mike Phillips: "Re: Mark 1:11"
• Previous message: Kevin W. Woodruff: "Re: Mark 1:11"
• In reply to: Mike Phillips: "Re: Mark 1:11"
• Next in thread: Mike Phillips: "Re: Mark 1:11"
• Reply: Mike Phillips: "Re: Mark 1:11"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:51 EDT