RE: Why isn't BAPTIZW translated

From: James H. Vellenga (jhv0@viewlogic.com)
Date: Fri Sep 20 1996 - 08:22:37 EDT

• Next message: A K M Adam: "RE: Why isn't BAPTIZW translated"
• Previous message: Randall McRoberts: "RE: Why isn't BAPTIZW translated"
• Maybe in reply to: Carl W. Conrad: "RE: Why isn't BAPTIZW translated"
• Next in thread: A K M Adam: "RE: Why isn't BAPTIZW translated"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Well done, Carl! Although it appears that one of the problems
with a reductio ad absurdum is that it can spawn even greater
absurdities.

And, yes, Mike, I enjoyed yours too.

Regards,
Jim V.

• Next message: A K M Adam: "RE: Why isn't BAPTIZW translated"
• Previous message: Randall McRoberts: "RE: Why isn't BAPTIZW translated"
• Maybe in reply to: Carl W. Conrad: "RE: Why isn't BAPTIZW translated"
• Next in thread: A K M Adam: "RE: Why isn't BAPTIZW translated"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:52 EDT