Re: Tense, mostly

From: Don Wilkins (dwilkins@ucrac1.ucr.edu)
Date: Fri Dec 13 1996 - 21:30:38 EST


At 4:57 PM 12/12/96, Jonathan Robie wrote:
 . . .
>Hi, Don,
>
>You've just stepped right into two of my pet peeves simultaneously. The goal
>of a scientific explanation isn't to deal with problem passages, but to deal
>with all of the data, including the problem passages.
>
>The same holds for programming, incidentally, you want to have a design that
>encompasses the entire problem, not an inadequate design with lots of
>patches here and there to handle special cases.

Ditto, Jonathan (I say that most emphatically NOT as a Limbaugh fan)! I
wish Apple C. would listen to you instead of going with their present
plans--which are still better than Wintell :-).

Don W.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:59 EDT