Heb 11:16b...

From: Tom Launder (ae298@lafn.org)
Date: Fri Jan 03 1997 - 04:39:31 EST

• Next message: Carl W. Conrad: "Re: Heb 11:16b..."
• Previous message: Carlton Winbery: "Re: Heb 11:16b..."
• Next in thread: Carlton Winbery: "Re: Heb 11:16b..."
• Maybe reply: Carlton Winbery: "Re: Heb 11:16b..."
• Reply: Carl W. Conrad: "Re: Heb 11:16b..."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Hi all,

I have a question about Heb 11:16b....

DIO OUK EPAISXUNETAI AUTOUS O QEOS QEOS EPIKALEISQAI AUTWN

I have not been able to understand how the autous works in this
sentence. Is the autous the subject of the complimentary infinitive
epikaeisQai? Or is the autous the direct object with nothing to do with
the comp. inf?

Also...

What about the second Qeos? Is this indirect discourse? Why the
nominative case?

Thanks for your help,

Tom

• Next message: Carl W. Conrad: "Re: Heb 11:16b..."
• Previous message: Carlton Winbery: "Re: Heb 11:16b..."
• Next in thread: Carlton Winbery: "Re: Heb 11:16b..."
• Maybe reply: Carlton Winbery: "Re: Heb 11:16b..."
• Reply: Carl W. Conrad: "Re: Heb 11:16b..."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:38:01 EDT