Re; John 3:5 and the genitive

From: Eric Weiss (eweiss@gte.net)
Date: Sat Mar 15 1997 - 12:13:28 EST


If (1) refers to a first or natural birth and (2) refers to second or
spiritual birth, Id portray the dialogue this way:

          (2) 3:3 APEKRIQH IHSOUS KAI EIPEN AUTWi, AMHN, AMHN LEGW SOI,
          EAN MH TIS GENNHQHi ANWQEN, OU DUNATAI IDEIN THN BASILEIAN TOU
          QEOU.

          (2) 3:4 LEGEI PROS AUTON hO NIKODHMOS, PWS DUNATAI ANQRWPOS
          GENNHQHNAI GERWN WN; MH DUNATAI EIS THN KOILIAN THS MHTROS
          AUTOU DEUTERON EISELQEIN KAI GENNHQHNAI;

          (2) 3:5 APEKRIQH IHSOUS, AMHN, AMHN LEGW SOI, EAN MH TIS
          GENNHQHi EX hUDATOS KAI PNEUMATOS, OU DUNATAI EISELQEIN EIS
          THN BASILEIAN TOU QEOU.

- or -

(1) 3:5 APEKRIQH IHSOUS, AMHN, AMHN LEGW SOI, EAN MH TIS GENNHQHi EX
hUDATOS

          (2) KAI PNEUMATOS, OU DUNATAI EISELQEIN EIS THN BASILEIAN TOU
          QEOU.

(1) 3:6 TO GEGENNHMENON EK THS SARKOS SARX ESTIN,

          (2) KAI TO GEGENNHMENON EK TOU PNEUMATOS PNEUMA ESTIN.

          (2) 3:7 MH QAUMASHiS hOTI EIPON SOI, DEI hUMAS GENNHQHNAI
          ANWQEN.

          (2) 3:8 TO PNEUMA hOPOU QELEI PNEI KAI THN FWNHN AUTOU
          AKOUEIS, ALL' OUK OIDAS POQEN ERCETAI KAI POU hUPAGEI - hOUTWS
          ESTIN PAS hO GEGENNHMENOS EK TOU PNEUMATOS.

          (2) 3:9 APEKRIQH NIKODHMOS KAI EIPEN AUTWi, PWS DUNATAI TAUTA
          GENESQAI;

Does laying it out this way suggest that one of the two possibilities
for 3:5 is to be preferred?

--
"Eric S. and Karol-Ann Weiss"
http://home1.gte.net/eweiss/index.htm


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:38:09 EDT