It wasn't Jonathan...

From: Mari Broman Olsen (molsen@umiacs.umd.edu)
Date: Thu May 08 1997 - 09:56:15 EDT

• Next message: Andrew Kulikovsky: "EN + dative in Eph 5:18"
• Previous message: Clayton Bartholomew: "RE: EN + dative in Eph 5:18 final comment"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This was Micheal again (below). My mistake: I got lost in the Q and
A...

Mari

>***Jonathan Robie writes (with lots left out):
>
>In the traditional grammars the term 'Aktionsart' is used for a
>bewildering mixture... Linguists who see 'Aktionsart' as Mari does,
>clearly have no reason to reject the term.

• Next message: Andrew Kulikovsky: "EN + dative in Eph 5:18"
• Previous message: Clayton Bartholomew: "RE: EN + dative in Eph 5:18 final comment"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:38:14 EDT