From: kdlitwak (kdlitwak@concentric.net)
Date: Wed May 14 1997 - 01:51:24 EDT
I just wanted to add my $.01989486 (Pentium) to this discussion. I
have noticed in reading non=biblical Greek this semester that writers
feel a lot fo liberty in both writing elliptically, leaving out
necessary prepositions or using cases in seemingly inappropriate ways.
I can't remember the text, but while reading in Pseudo-Eupolemos a few
weeks ago, I cam across what MUST be an accusative of means, even though
there isn't supposed to be sucha thing. Just now, in Polybius, 2.56.14,
I find
EAN MEN ARCWN ADIKWN CEIRWN PAQHi TIS TOUTO
I think this says if anyone who rules (i.e., has) unjust hands he may
suffer for this, thus using TOUTO as an indirect object. After a
semeste of Lucian, THucydiees and Polybuis, I've basically thrown up my
hands in despair at applying the rules or grammatical categories I know
because just as soon as I do that some author goes WAY WAY WAY outside
the lines and uses the cases however he felt like. I'm no classicist, I
admit, but this is what I've observedin what I've trtanslated so far in
situations where there really isn't an alternative. The author is not
using the case in a recognized way. That either means the peson is
using bad grammar or we don't know the rules classical authors worked
by. Any other hypotheses?
Ken Litwak
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:38:15 EDT