From: Rod Decker (rdecker@bbc.edu)
Date: Thu Jul 17 1997 - 07:55:08 EDT
>I am not the one to even pretend to defend Porter's use of
>"imperfective" aspect with EIMI.
I am not even going to think of joining this thread (too busy!)--even
though it has metamorphosed off a query that I made re. time, but I must
say this: Porter explicitly classes EIMI as aspectually vague and thus not
a part of the aspect system; it is not legit. to appeal to Porter as
defending an imperfective aspect view of EIMI. See his ch. 10 in _Verbal
Aspect_.
Rod
_________________________________________________________________
Rodney J. Decker Baptist Bible Seminary
Asst. Prof./NT P O Box 800
rdecker@bbc.edu Clarks Summit PA 18411
http://www.bbc.edu/courses/BBS/RDecker/Index.htm USA
_________________________________________________________________
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:38:23 EDT