Col 1:19

From: Peter Phillips (p.m.phillips@cliff.shef.ac.uk)
Date: Tue Aug 05 1997 - 09:46:09 EDT

• Next message: Carl W. Conrad: "Re: Col 1:19"
• Previous message: Carl W. Conrad: "Re: Acts 17:18"
• Next in thread: Carl W. Conrad: "Re: Col 1:19"
• Reply: Carl W. Conrad: "Re: Col 1:19"
• Maybe reply: Will Wagers: "Re: Col 1:19"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Do you think PAN TO PLHRWMA is the subject of verse 19 or part of an
accusative+infinitive construction after EUDOKHSEN with HO QEOS supplied as
the subject of this verb?

If it is the subject what does it mean in a pre/proto-Gnostic setting?

If HO QEOS is to be supplied then why didn't [Paul] use the passive as he
has throughout the previous verses?
        
Pete Phillips,
Cliff College, Sheffield, England

p.m.phillips@cliff.shef.ac.uk
http://champness.shef.ac.uk/

• Next message: Carl W. Conrad: "Re: Col 1:19"
• Previous message: Carl W. Conrad: "Re: Acts 17:18"
• Next in thread: Carl W. Conrad: "Re: Col 1:19"
• Reply: Carl W. Conrad: "Re: Col 1:19"
• Maybe reply: Will Wagers: "Re: Col 1:19"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:38:24 EDT