Re: Spamming for Jesus is good

From: CEP7@aol.com
Date: Sat Aug 30 1997 - 00:43:51 EDT

• Next message: Carl W. Conrad: "Anti-spam site (was: Spamming for Jesus ...)"
• Previous message: John Neal: "Re: Spamming for Jesus is good"
• Maybe in reply to: John Neal: "Spamming for Jesus is good"
• Next in thread: Carl W. Conrad: "Anti-spam site (was: Spamming for Jesus ...)"
• Reply: Carl W. Conrad: "Anti-spam site (was: Spamming for Jesus ...)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

I think we have wasted more space criticizing the comment than the comment
merited. I think it would have best to let it go.

Charles Powell
DTS

• Next message: Carl W. Conrad: "Anti-spam site (was: Spamming for Jesus ...)"
• Previous message: John Neal: "Re: Spamming for Jesus is good"
• Maybe in reply to: John Neal: "Spamming for Jesus is good"
• Next in thread: Carl W. Conrad: "Anti-spam site (was: Spamming for Jesus ...)"
• Reply: Carl W. Conrad: "Anti-spam site (was: Spamming for Jesus ...)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:38:26 EDT