Re: ALLOS and Jn. 1:1c/Was Anarthrous Subject

From: Jonathan Robie (jwrobie@mindspring.com)
Date: Tue Sep 09 1997 - 15:01:43 EDT

Next message: Paul F. Evans: "Re: ALLOS and Jn. 1:1c/Was Anarthrous Subject"
Previous message: CWestf5155@aol.com: "Re: ALLOS and Jn. 1:1c/Was Anarthrous Subject"
Maybe in reply to: CWestf5155@aol.com: "ALLOS and Jn. 1:1c/Was Anarthrous Subject"
Next in thread: Paul F. Evans: "Re: ALLOS and Jn. 1:1c/Was Anarthrous Subject"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 01:26 PM 9/9/97 -0400, CWestf5155@aol.com wrote:
>My point is not to prove a complex unit in QEOS with only Jn. 1:1-2, and I do
>want to stick to the immediate literary context and the point that is at
>issue.

I have no idea what a "complex unit" is...could somebody please explain what
they are talking about?

Thanks!

Jonathan

***************************************************************************
Jonathan Robie jwrobie@mindspring.com http://www.mindspring.com/~jwrobie
POET Software, 3207 Gibson Road, Durham, N.C., 27703 http://www.poet.com
***************************************************************************

Next message: Paul F. Evans: "Re: ALLOS and Jn. 1:1c/Was Anarthrous Subject"
Previous message: CWestf5155@aol.com: "Re: ALLOS and Jn. 1:1c/Was Anarthrous Subject"
Maybe in reply to: CWestf5155@aol.com: "ALLOS and Jn. 1:1c/Was Anarthrous Subject"
Next in thread: Paul F. Evans: "Re: ALLOS and Jn. 1:1c/Was Anarthrous Subject"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:38:28 EDT