From: Andrew Kulikovsky (anku@celsiustech.se)
Date: Wed Sep 24 1997 - 06:20:14 EDT
On Tue, 23 Sep 1997, Jack Kilmon wrote:
>
> Simply because the vox ipsissima Iesu was Aramaic and not Greek.
>
so what?
> > The (incredibly well documented) canon of scripture we have is the
> > inspired
> > word of God not some theoretical reconstruction...
>
> Are you saying that the Greek-speaking Matthean author was
> "inspired"moreso than the Aramaic speaking Jesus?
>
Not at all - it just that we don't have Jesus actual words (other than
potentially wrong reconstructions) so why not stick to the inspired,
inerrant (in my view) words we do have?
cheers,
Andrew
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:38:29 EDT