From: Jonathan Robie (jwrobie@mindspring.com)
Date: Wed Sep 24 1997 - 21:45:08 EDT
At 04:46 PM 9/24/97 +0000, Andrew Kulikovsky wrote:
>Filoi,
>
>I get the impression, from a number of posts on this list (and other
>lists as well) that being an inerrantist is being unscholarly - it's as
>though the attitude is well, "you're an inerrantist - that speaks for
>itself - you can't be a thinking scholar and an inerrantist". In other
>words "only a complete moron would be an inerrantist."
If this is in response to the 1 John 2:7-8 thread, I really don't get it. I
never claimed that 1 John contained any errors.
Jonathan
***************************************************************************
Jonathan Robie jwrobie@mindspring.com http://www.mindspring.com/~jwrobie
POET Software, 3207 Gibson Road, Durham, N.C., 27703 http://www.poet.com
***************************************************************************
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:38:30 EDT