Phil 3:15

From: Kevin and Sandi Anderson (crossroads@sprynet.com)
Date: Wed Dec 03 1997 - 09:49:41 EST

• Next message: Carl William Conrad: "Re: Phil 3:15"
• Previous message: Daniel Ria–o: "Re: Rev 11:3 KAI DWSW TOIS DUSIN MARTUSIN MOU"
• Next in thread: Carl William Conrad: "Re: Phil 3:15"
• Reply: Carl William Conrad: "Re: Phil 3:15"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

I have read that Phil 3:15a ought to be translated, "Therefore, as many as
_will be_ [instead of _are_] perfect...." I am not so much interested in the
interpretive vagaries elicited by this suggestion (although if anybody wants
to pursue them I would be happy to sit back and watch the fireworks) as I am
interested in knowing whether anyone can recall other instances where a
predicate nominative may be reasonably translated in something other than
the present tense.

Cheers,
Kevin L. Anderson
Ph.D. Student
London Bible College/Brunel University
Reading at Asbury Theo'l Seminary

• Next message: Carl William Conrad: "Re: Phil 3:15"
• Previous message: Daniel Ria–o: "Re: Rev 11:3 KAI DWSW TOIS DUSIN MARTUSIN MOU"
• Next in thread: Carl William Conrad: "Re: Phil 3:15"
• Reply: Carl William Conrad: "Re: Phil 3:15"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:38:36 EDT