Re: Revelation 13:10

From: Jonathan Robie (jonathan@texcel.no)
Date: Fri Dec 19 1997 - 13:50:16 EST

• Next message: Carl W. Conrad: "Re: Revelation 13:10"
• Previous message: Jonathan Robie: "Re: Revelation 13:10"
• In reply to: clayton stirling bartholomew: "Re: Revelation 13:10"
• Next in thread: Carl W. Conrad: "Re: Revelation 13:10"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 09:06 AM 12/19/97 +0000, clayton stirling bartholomew wrote:

>The verb that would be used would be some form of EIMI which is optional even
>in straight prose and this is not straight prose but something more like
>poetry.
 
OK, my error.

Jonathan
 
jonathan@texcel.no
Texcel Research
http://www.texcel.no

• Next message: Carl W. Conrad: "Re: Revelation 13:10"
• Previous message: Jonathan Robie: "Re: Revelation 13:10"
• In reply to: clayton stirling bartholomew: "Re: Revelation 13:10"
• Next in thread: Carl W. Conrad: "Re: Revelation 13:10"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:38:40 EDT