From: Carlton Winbery (winberyc@popalex1.linknet.net)
Date: Tue Dec 23 1997 - 05:02:28 EST
Roger Hutchinson wrote;
>Granted that there is a strong desire to harmonize. However, there must also
>be a logical consistency to the passage in Luke (assuming Luke was writing
>rationally).
>
>It seems certain (Is this correct?) that Luke meant to tell the reader that
>Jesus was not the physical son of Joseph. Jesus was, as supposed (but not
>really), the son of Joseph.
>
I agree. And I agree with those who see the genealogy as that of Joseph.
Carlton L. Winbery
Fogleman Professor of Religion
Louisiana College
Pineville, LA 71359
winberyc@popalex1.linknet.net
winbery@andria.lacollege.edu
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:38:41 EDT