Re: simple, coherent and plausible hypothesis.

From: Nichael Lynn Cramer (nichael@sover.net)
Date: Mon Feb 02 1998 - 19:21:10 EST

Next message: Stephen C. Carlson: "Re: simple, coherent and plausible hypothesis."
Previous message: Brian E. Wilson: "simple, coherent and plausible hypothesis."
In reply to: Brian E. Wilson: "simple, coherent and plausible hypothesis."
Next in thread: Stephen C. Carlson: "Re: simple, coherent and plausible hypothesis."
Reply: Stephen C. Carlson: "Re: simple, coherent and plausible hypothesis."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Brian E. Wilson wrote:
>>I thought you might actually have stated something like - "Matthew
>>copied from Mark, and Luke copied from both Matthew and Mark. No
>>hypothetical sources are posited."
>>
>>This would at least have been simple.

Actually, no; it would have been anything _but_ simple as Gerald Downing
has amply demonstrated.

Nichael
nichael@sover.net
http://www.sover.net/~nichael/

Next message: Stephen C. Carlson: "Re: simple, coherent and plausible hypothesis."
Previous message: Brian E. Wilson: "simple, coherent and plausible hypothesis."
In reply to: Brian E. Wilson: "simple, coherent and plausible hypothesis."
Next in thread: Stephen C. Carlson: "Re: simple, coherent and plausible hypothesis."
Reply: Stephen C. Carlson: "Re: simple, coherent and plausible hypothesis."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:39:01 EDT