From: Revcraigh@aol.com
Date: Tue Feb 03 1998 - 21:05:20 EST
Dear B-Greekers,
I wish to make a slight emmendation to my previous post which read in part:
<<That the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th occurance of the relative in 1 John 1:1 are not
(and cannot be) nominative subjects of...>>
To make sense, it should read:
"The proof that the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th..."
God bless,
Rev. Craig R. Harmon, pastor
Lutheran Church of the Apostles
5100 W. 115th Street
Alsip, IL 60803
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:39:01 EDT