From: Jonathan Robie (jonathan@texcel.no)
Date: Tue Feb 10 1998 - 19:53:34 EST
At 04:35 PM 2/10/98 -0800, lakr wrote:
>Jonathan, I don't think I said that the action of HN did not happen
>in the past, with reference to when John narrates. However, I don't
>think this is what Craig means. I understood him to mean that the 'tense'
>of HN because of it's tense form extends into the infinite unbounded past,
>because of the nature of the verb itself. I don't think you really
>believe this is the case, do you ?
No, I believe that HN refers to a past time which is identified as EN ARCH.
At this time, the Word was.
Jonathan
jonathan@texcel.no
Texcel Research
http://www.texcel.no
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:39:03 EDT