Re: Common-sense aorist

From: dalmatia@eburg.com
Date: Wed Apr 08 1998 - 11:20:53 EDT

• Next message: Carl W. Conrad: "Re: Common-sense aorist"
• Previous message: Carl W. Conrad: "Re: Common-sense aorist"
• In reply to: Carl W. Conrad: "Re: Common-sense aorist"
• Next in thread: Carl W. Conrad: "Re: Common-sense aorist"
• Reply: Carl W. Conrad: "Re: Common-sense aorist"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Carl W. Conrad wrote:

>
> You see, I would have said that ONLY had KATELABEN been written in the
> perfect could it carry that permanence: in the form KATEILHFE--as when
> Jesus uses the perfect on the cross and says, TETELESTAI in a tense form
> that expresses finality beyond compromise.

Thanks Carl ~

I think we've got this pretty well 'crisped up' now. I agree with
your assessment of TETELESTAI, that it expresses permanence and
finality beyond compromise. Would you agree with me that it is an
historical statement, referring to all the historical things that He
was given to do by His Father Who sent Him, that this has all been
accomplished?

George

• Next message: Carl W. Conrad: "Re: Common-sense aorist"
• Previous message: Carl W. Conrad: "Re: Common-sense aorist"
• In reply to: Carl W. Conrad: "Re: Common-sense aorist"
• Next in thread: Carl W. Conrad: "Re: Common-sense aorist"
• Reply: Carl W. Conrad: "Re: Common-sense aorist"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:39:22 EDT