From whence it IS?

From: WmHBoyd@aol.com
Date: Tue Jun 02 1998 - 22:11:40 EDT

Next message: Jim West: "Re: From whence it IS?"
Previous message: Carl W. Conrad: "Re: "Semantic Domain" and Translating Synonyms (was: entropy)"
Next in thread: Jim West: "Re: From whence it IS?"
Maybe reply: Jim West: "Re: From whence it IS?"
Maybe reply: Dale M. Wheeler: "Re: From whence it IS?"
Maybe reply: Jim West: "Re: From whence it IS?"
Maybe reply: Jim West: "Re: From whence it IS?"
Reply: dalmatia@eburg.com: "Re: From whence it IS?"
Maybe reply: WmHBoyd@aol.com: "Re: From whence it IS?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

John 2:9 - KAI OUK HDEI POQEN ESTIN - I am thinking this means, "and not
knowing from whence it was," but ESTIN is present tense. Would that be ,"and
not knowing from whence it is?" That sounds awkward to me. Why present tense
instead of past?

William Boyd

Next message: Jim West: "Re: From whence it IS?"
Previous message: Carl W. Conrad: "Re: "Semantic Domain" and Translating Synonyms (was: entropy)"
Next in thread: Jim West: "Re: From whence it IS?"
Maybe reply: Jim West: "Re: From whence it IS?"
Maybe reply: Dale M. Wheeler: "Re: From whence it IS?"
Maybe reply: Jim West: "Re: From whence it IS?"
Maybe reply: Jim West: "Re: From whence it IS?"
Reply: dalmatia@eburg.com: "Re: From whence it IS?"
Maybe reply: WmHBoyd@aol.com: "Re: From whence it IS?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:39:45 EDT