Re: Mt 28.19 - antecedent of AUTOUS

From: Carl W. Conrad (cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu)
Date: Thu Jul 02 1998 - 07:38:22 EDT


At 11:52 PM -0400 7/01/98, Benjamin Raymond wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I've previously read PANTA TA EQNH in Mt 28.19 as the antecedent of AUTOUS.
> For some reason I overlooked the gender difference.
>
>Is there an explicit antecedent for AUTOUS?

I think you were right the first time, Ben. EQNH happens to be neuter
plural, but it refers to Gentile persons in this instance, I think we ought
to say, and therefore the generic masculine plural pronoun is used for it
in this instance; certainly there is no other masculine plural antecedent.

Carl W. Conrad
Department of Classics, Washington University
Summer: 1647 Grindstaff Road/Burnsville, NC 28714/(828) 675-4243
cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu
WWW: http://www.artsci.wustl.edu/~cwconrad/

---
B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to unsubscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to 


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:39:51 EDT