Re: OU + MH + aor. subj.

From: Carl W. Conrad (cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu)
Date: Wed Jul 15 1998 - 07:02:48 EDT


At 1:44 PM +0300 7/15/98, Timo Flink wrote:
>Howdy :)
>
>I ran a test in BibleWorks (AGNT2) and it reports 76 hits for "OU MH +
>some aor. subj."
>
>As I'm not a native English speaker, this might be complitely wrong, but
>could that be expressed something like:
>
>"by no means you might do this and that"
>
>Just a thought... Yes I know, sounds like an imperative....

In the original question Zerwick was cited as saying this (OU MH + aorist
subj.) is the strongest possible Greek form of stating the imperative
notion. A Latin equivalent is NE + perfect subjunctive with the sense, like
that of the Greek construction, "Don't ever xxxx ..." or "You are not ever
to xxxx ..." Now archaic English would have put it: "You SHALL not xxxx ..."

Carl W. Conrad
Department of Classics, Washington University
Summer: 1647 Grindstaff Road/Burnsville, NC 28714/(828) 675-4243
cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu
WWW: http://www.artsci.wustl.edu/~cwconrad/

---
B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to unsubscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:39:53 EDT