Re: Trench's Synonyms of the NT

From: Eric Weiss (eweiss@gte.net)
Date: Sun Aug 16 1998 - 00:47:48 EDT


I am not qualified either to argue or agree with James Ware's praises of
Trench's Synonyms (I have a 1948 Eerdmans edition of the ninth edition,
published in London in 1880 - how much better is the 11th edition, or is
mine a "dumbed down" edition?). BUT ... I (not having really used it - I
got it really cheap at a used bookstore) have cautioned some people
against it because D.A. Carson, in his EXEGETICAL FALLACIES (p. 54 of
the 1984 edition) says (re: Problems surrounding synonyms and
componential analysis): "But if we decide contextually specific
questions of synonymy on the basis of the total semantic range of each
word, any synonymy in any context is virtually impossible. Hendricksen's
treatment [of AGAPAW and FILEW in John 21] illegitimately forecloses the
question. This particular fallacy is a hallmark of Trench's SYNONYMS OF
THE NEW TESTAMENT."

--
"Eric S. Weiss"
http://home1.gte.net/eweiss/index.htm
eweiss@gte.net
S.D.G.

--- B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu] To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:39:56 EDT