Re: The word alone in Romans 3:28

From: Christopher Hutson (crhutson@salisbury.net)
Date: Mon Aug 24 1998 - 20:20:42 EDT


Thanks, Jim,

for the correction. I don't know why I wasn't seeing it before. I
followed Luther right up the garden path.

XPIC

------------------------------------
Christopher R. Hutson
          Hood Theological Seminary
          Salisbury, NC 28144
crhutson@salisbury.net
------------------------------------

Jim West wrote:

>>On Mon 24 Aug 98 (02:17:08), mathew3830@aol.com wrote:
>>>I would like to know
>>> if there is any justification for including the word alone in
Romans
>>> 3:28. If there is, what would that justification be? Is it based
>>> primarily on interpretation?
>
>
>No- there is no textual justification for including "allein"- Luther
here
>(and in several places) simply allowed his theology to influence his
>translation.
>
>Thus, yes, "alone" is an interpretative move.
>
>

---
B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:39:57 EDT